The High Court lifts seizure in case involving Bachmann/Partners client

By decision of 22 April 2026, the Eastern High Court held that the seizure carried out of our client’s assets was unjustified, as the conditions in Section 802(2) of the Danish Administration of Justice Act were not considered to have been met.

By decision of 22 April 2026, the Eastern High Court held that the seizure carried out of our client’s assets was unjustified, as the conditions in Section 802(2) of the Danish Administration of Justice Act were not considered to have been met.

Our client – who is represented by attorney Ann Rask Vang – has prevailed on a comprehensive and principled part of the criminal case, in which the High Court set aside the District Court’s decision on seizure.

The charge concerns alleged evasion of a substantial amount of VAT exceeding DKK 100 million. Based on the charge and the material available in the case, the prosecution assessed that the conditions for seizure were met.