sagsbehandlingsfejl fra skat

Procedural Errors Attributable to the Danish Tax Authorities

Procedural Errors Attributable to the Danish Tax Authorities

When the Danish Tax Authorities issue administrative decisions directed at private individuals or corporate entities, they are legally obliged to comply with a set of binding procedural requirements. These requirements follow, inter alia, from the Danish Public Administration Act, the Tax Administration Act, and general principles of administrative law. Their purpose is to ensure that decisions are rendered on a lawful, sufficiently informed, and procedurally robust foundation.

A failure to observe these requirements constitutes a procedural defect. Such defects may, depending on their nature and impact, lead to the invalidity of the decision. An invalid administrative decision must be set aside, irrespective of whether its substantive outcome might otherwise be correct or reasonable.

Bachmann/Partners possesses extensive experience in identifying, substantiating, and litigating procedural defects in administrative decision-making. We undertake a comprehensive legal assessment of the matter and advise on the prospects of obtaining annulment, remittal, or substantive amendment of the decision.

Nature and Classification of Procedural Errors

A procedural error arises where the Danish Tax Authorities fail to comply with the formal obligations governing the processing of a case. Such obligations include, but are not limited to:

  • The duty to conduct mandatory party consultation
  • The duty to provide an adequate and legally sufficient statement of reasons
  • The duty to establish the factual basis of the case ex officio (the official investigation principle)
  • Compliance with statutory or administrative statutes of limitation
  • Proper and accurate communication with authorized representatives


These obligations are not discretionary; they constitute fundamental guarantees designed to safeguard the legality, transparency, and reliability of the administrative process.

Materiality and the Doctrine of Invalidity

Not any procedural defect may result in invalidity. Danish administrative law applies a materiality doctrine, under which a defect must be material in order to justify annulment. Materiality is assessed on the basis of two cumulative criteria:

  1. General Materiality

This criterion examines whether the breached rule is intended to protect interests relating to the legality, correctness, or procedural integrity of the decision-making process. Rules of this nature are typically regarded as “guarantee provisions”.

  1. Concrete Materiality

This criterion assesses whether the defect has influenced—or may reasonably be assumed to have influenced—the substantive outcome of the case. If the defect has resulted in a materially incorrect or insufficiently informed decision, it will generally be considered unreasonable to uphold the decision.

Where both criteria are satisfied, the decision will typically be deemed invalid and must be annulled. In certain cases, the matter may be remitted to the authority for renewed consideration.

Contact us today for assistance

Christian 11_

| Attorney-at-law (H), Managing Partner

+45 30 30 45 21

chb@bachmann-partners.dk

Ann 5_

| Attorney-at-law (L), Ph.d., Partner

+45 20 94 78 21

ava@bachmann-partners.dk

Maria 1002 1 IMG_2690 kopier

| Attorney-at-law (H), LL.M., Partner

+45 21 74 04 89

mhy@bachmann-partners.dk

Simon 2_

| Attorney-at-law (H), Partner

+45 28 35 21 39

scl@bachmann-partners.dk

Tax Procedural Deadlines

In addition to general procedural rules, the Tax Administration Act also establishes various deadlines. These rules determine when authorities may initiate a case and when a decision must be made.

If authorities exceed these deadlines, the decision may be set aside as invalid, even if it is otherwise correct.

Here you can find answers to the most frequently asked questions

It is an error in the authority’s handling of a case. Examples include failure to hear the parties involved, insufficient reasoning, or exceeding statutory deadlines.

Yes. If the error is significant and has affected the content of the decision, it may result in the decision being annulled.

Contact us. We assess whether a procedural error has occurred and advise on your options for appealing or requesting a case review.

Yes, there are fixed deadlines. However, in certain cases, the deadline may be suspended if an error has been made by the authority.

Need Advice on Procedural Errors by Authorities?

Bachmann/Partners has some of Denmark’s leading experts in their field and is therefore qualified to guide you safely through complex processes related to procedural errors by authorities. Our specialists can lead you securely through the process, ensuring the outcome meets your expectations.

Contact us today for an informal meeting about your case.

Contact us today for an informal meeting about your case.

Regardless of your situation, we can help you create the most advantageous solution. We have Denmark’s best

team of lawyers and experts, so you can be confident you are receiving the best advice.

We have offices in Copenhagen, Aarhus, and Aalborg, so you always have access to tax advice near you.

Contact us today

Or fill out the form to learn more about how we can help you or to book a meeting with us.

Should we contact you?

Then fill out the contact form below. Then a lawyer will contact you within the area you need help with.